Environmental Ethics 30 (3):325-336 (2008)
|Abstract||Habitats (where we live), habits (how we live), and inhabitants (who we are) constitute an ecosystem unit. The biosphere is composed of a reticulate mosaic of these habitat-habit-inhabitant units, where humans (with their indigenous languages, ecological knowledge, and practices) have coevolved. Today, these diverse ecosystem units are being violently destroyed by the imposition of a single global colonial cultural model. In Cape Horn at the southern end of the Americas, educators, authorities, and decision makers do not know about the native habitats, language, and flora, and do not distinguish between Cape Horn’s flora and the flora that grows in other parts of the country or the world. In contrast, indigenous people and old residents have a detailed knowledge, but they do not participate in education, and decision making. It is not Homo sapiens in general, but bioculturally biased educators, authorities, and decision makers who need to be transformed into (educated and responsible) members and citizen of biocultural communities. The Omora Ethnobotanical Park educational program was launched to contribute to a biocultural citizenship involving three critical steps: (1) the disclosing of biocultural diversity with a “fine filter” approach that permits understanding of the cultural and ecological diversity hidden by general universal labels; (2) direct “face-to-face” encounters with human and nonhuman co-inhabitants; and (3) actions for protection of habitats and implementation of interpretative spaces that facilitate direct encounters and conservation of biocultural diversity. These steps have been implemented at local and regional scales through the creation of the Omora Ethnobotanical Park and the UNESCO Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ricardo Rozzi, Francisca Massardo, Felipe Cruz, Christophe Grenier & Andrea Muñoz (2010). Galapagos and Cape Horn. Environmental Philosophy 7 (2):1-32.
Ricardo Rozzi (2007). Future Environmental Philosophies and Their Biocultural Conservation Interfaces. Ethics and the Environment 12 (2):142-145.
Kelli Moses (2008). Field Environmental Philosophy and Biocultural Conservation. Environmental Ethics 30 (3).
Robert Frodeman (2008). Integrating Ecological Sciences and Environmental Ethics Into Biocultural Conservation. Environmental Ethics 30 (3):229-234.
David Rothenberg (2004). On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment. Environmental Ethics 26 (1):97-99.
Christopher B. Anderson, Gene E. Likens, Ricardo Rozzi, Julio R. Gutiérrez & Juan J. Armesto (2008). Integrating Science and Society Through Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research. Environmental Ethics 30 (3):295-312.
David Harmon (1987). Cultural Diversity, Human Subsistence, and the National Park Ideal. Environmental Ethics 9 (2):147-158.
Ben A. Minteer & James P. Collins (2008). From Environmental to Ecological Ethics: Toward a Practical Ethics for Ecologists and Conservationists. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4).
Javier Laborde (2008). The Landscape Approach. Environmental Ethics 30 (3):251-262.
Kurt Jax (2008). Local Versus Global Knowledge. Environmental Ethics 30 (3):273-294.
Robert Frodeman (2008). Redefining Ecological Ethics: Science, Policy, and Philosophy at Cape Horn. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4).
Anya Plutynski (2007). A Philosopher Goes Wild. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (1):289-296.
Kelli Moses (2008). Filosofía Ambiental de Campo y Conservación Biocultural. Environmental Ethics 30 (Supplement).
Robert Frodeman (2008). Integrando las Ciencias Ecológicas y la Ética Ambiental en la Conservación Biocultural. Environmental Ethics 30 (Supplement):9-16.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads2 ( #232,316 of 549,014 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,014 )
How can I increase my downloads?