Are Chemical Kind Terms Rigid Appliers?

Erkenntnis 78 (6):1303-1316 (2013)
Abstract
According to Michael Devitt, the primary work of a rigidity distinction for kind terms is to distinguish non-descriptional predicates from descriptional predicates. The standard conception of rigidity fails to do this work when it is extended to kind terms. Against the standard conception, Devitt defends rigid application: a predicate is a rigid applier iff, if it applies to an object in one world, it applies to that object in every world in which it exists. Devitt maintains that rigid application does the job of identifying nondescriptional predicates perfectly. I argue that Devitt is wrong about this. When we examine more closely alternative theories about the identity and persistence conditions of those entities to which mass terms apply, we find no plausible theory that has the result that a term is rigid iff it is non-descriptional
Keywords Rigid Designation  Kind Terms  Michael Devitt  Mass Terms  Stuff
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,948
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 13 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Michael Devitt (2005). Rigid Application. Philosophical Studies 125 (2):139--165.
Michael P. Wolf, Rigid Designation and Natural Kind Terms, Pittsburgh Style. Normative Functionalism and the Pittsburgh School.
Jussi Haukioja (2012). Rigidity and Actuality-Dependence. Philosophical Studies 157 (3):399-410.
Nathan Salmon (2012). Generality. Philosophical Studies 161 (3):471-481.
João Branquinho (2003). In Defense of Obstinacy. Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):1–23.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-11-30

Total downloads

6 ( #203,263 of 1,100,778 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #176,465 of 1,100,778 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.