A puzzle about posthumous predication
Philosophical Review 97 (2):211-236 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDonald Davidson (2005). Truth and Predication. Harvard University Press.
Robert Heinaman (1981). Self-Predication in the Sophist. Phronesis 26 (1):55-66.
Gabriel Uzquiano (2010). How to Solve the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever in Two Questions. Analysis 70 (1):39-44.
Brian Rabern & Landon Rabern (2008). A Simple Solution to the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever. [REVIEW] Analysis 68 (2):105-112.
Alessandro Lenci (1998). The Structure of Predication. Synthese 114 (2):233-276.
James Stacey Taylor (2008). Harming the Dead. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:185-202.
Douglas W. Portmore (2007). Desire Fulfillment and Posthumous Harm. American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):27 - 38.
Ernest Partridge (1981). Posthumous Interests and Posthumous Respect. Ethics 91 (2):243-264.
Steven Luper (2007). Mortal Harm. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):239–251.
David-Hillel Ruben (1990). A Reply to Professor Haji on Posthumous Predication. Grazer Philosophische Studien 38:195-199.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads18 ( #67,448 of 548,977 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,977 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
