Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):485-494 (2008)
|Abstract||Neuroeconomics is examined critically using data on the response times of subjects who were asked to express their preferences in the context of the Allais Paradox. Different patterns of choice are found among the fast and slow responders. This suggests that we try to identify types of economic agents by the time they take to make their choices. Nevertheless, it is argued that it is far from clear if and how neuroeconomics will change economics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Benoit Hardy-Vallée (2007). Decision-Making: A Neuroeconomic Perspective. Philosophy Compass 2 (6):939–953.
Moana Vercoe & Paul J. Zak (2010). Inductive Modeling Using Causal Studies in Neuroeconomics: Brains on Drugs. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):133-146.
Benoit Hardy-Vallee (2007). Decision-Making: A Neuroeconomic Perspective. Philosophy Compass 2 (6):939-953.
Roberto Fumagalli (2010). The Disunity of Neuroeconomics: A Methodological Appraisal. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):119-131.
Glenn Harrison & Don Ross (2010). The Methodologies of Neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):185-196.
Michiru Nagatsu (2010). Function and Mechanism: The Metaphysics of Neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):197-205.
Ran Spiegler (2008). Comments on the Potential Significance of Neuroeconomics for Economic Theory. Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):515-521.
Anthony Landreth & John Bickle (2008). Neuroeconomics, Neurophysiology and the Common Currency Hypothesis. Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):419-429.
N. Emrah Aydinonat (2010). Neuroeconomics: More Than Inspiration, Less Than Revolution. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):159-169.
Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde (2010). Is Neuroeconomics Doomed by the Reverse Inference Fallacy? Mind and Society 9 (2):229-249.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #115,524 of 556,912 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?