|Abstract||Lecture audiences and students were asked to respond to virtual decision and game situations at gametheory.tau.ac.il. Several thousand observations were collected and the response time for each answer was recorded. There were signiﬁcant differences in response time across responses. It is suggested that choices made instinctively, that is, on the basis of an emotional response, require less response time than choices that require the use of cognitive reasoning|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
David LaBerge, L. Auclair & E. Sieroff (2000). Preparatory Attention: Experiment and Theory. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (3):396-434.
Eve A. Isham & Joy J. Geng (forthcoming). Rewarding Performance Feedback Alters Reported Time of Action. Consciousness and Cognition.
Ralph Hertwig Valerie M. Chase (1998). Many Reasons or Just One: How Response Mode Affects Reasoning in the Conjunction Problem. Thinking and Reasoning 4 (4):319 – 352.
Jonathan St B. T. Evans (2007). On the Resolution of Conflict in Dual Process Theories of Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 13 (4):321 – 339.
Steven H. White (1999). What is a Hero? An Exploratory Study of Students' Conceptions of Heroes. Journal of Moral Education 28 (1):81-95.
Jerry Paul Sheppard & Marnie Young (2007). The Routes of Moral Development and the Impact of Exposure to the Milgram Obedience Study. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (4):315 - 333.
Orly Fuhrman & Lera Boroditsky (2010). Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence From an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task. Cognitive Science 34 (8):1430-1451.
Ariel Rubinstein (2008). Comments on Neuroeconomics. Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):485-494.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,250 of 722,787 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,787 )
How can I increase my downloads?