The Particularized Judgment Account of Privacy

Res Publica 17 (3):275-290 (2011)
Questions of privacy have become particularly salient in recent years due, in part, to information-gathering initiatives precipitated by the 2001 World Trade Center attacks, increasing power of surveillance and computing technologies, and massive data collection about individuals for commercial purposes. While privacy is not new to the philosophical and legal literature, there is much to say about the nature and value of privacy. My focus here is on the nature of informational privacy. I argue that the predominant accounts of privacy are unsatisfactory and offer an alternative: for a person to have informational privacy is for there to be limits on the particularized judgments that others are able to reasonably make about that person
Keywords Privacy  Surveillance  Information ethics  Particularized judgments
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-011-9160-4
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,201
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
James Rachels (1975). Why Privacy is Important. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
W. A. Parent (1983). Privacy, Morality, and the Law. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (4):269-288.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Steven Davis (2009). Is There a Right to Privacy? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):450-475.
David Matheson (2007). Unknowableness and Informational Privacy. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:251-267.
Elin Palm (2009). Privacy Expectations at Work—What is Reasonable and Why? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (2):201 - 215.
Peter Hustinx (2010). Privacy by Design: Delivering the Promises. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):253-255.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

56 ( #85,304 of 1,940,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #333,940 of 1,940,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.