David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (4):411-412 (2002)
My main reaction to “Intelligence without representation” is to applaud. Dreyfus’s use of Merleau-Ponty is a refreshing new breeze in philosophy of psychology. About twenty or so years ago, philosophers struck an unfortunate course dictated by a pair of dubious assumptions: (1) that ordinary psychological attributions were at risk unless vindicated by some science; and (2) that the only possible scientific vindication required that intentional content be represented in the brain. Thus did representationalism become, in Jerry Fodor’s memorable phrase, “the only game in town.” As John Haugeland pointed out early on, skills (and moods) do not fit easily into the representationalist scheme. Happily, Dreyfus’s paper goes a considerable way toward an alternative approach to mind.
|Keywords||Philosophy Phenomenology Philosophy of Mind Artificial Intelligence Interdisciplinary Studies Developmental Psychology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lynne Rudder Baker (2002). Comments on Hubert L. Dreyfus “Intelligence Without Representation”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (4):411-412.
Evan Selinger (2008). Collins's Incorrect Depiction of Dreyfus's Critique of Artificial Intelligence. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (2):301-308.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1986). Misrepresenting Human Intelligence. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):430-441.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1963). Wild on Heidegger: Comments. Journal of Philosophy 60 (22):677-680.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (2002). Comments on Cristina Lafont's Interpretation of Being and Time. Inquiry 45 (2):191 – 194.
Matjaz Gams (ed.) (1997). Mind Versus Computer: Were Dreyfus and Winograd Right? Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Ron Bruzina (1990). Comments On: “On the Ordering of Things: Being and Power in Heidegger and Foucault” by Hubert Dreyfus. Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (S1):97-104.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1979). A Framework for Misrepresenting Knowledge. In Martin Ringle (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence. Humanities Press
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1983). Michel Foucault, Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press.
Setargew Kenaw (2008). Hubert L. Dreyfus's Critique of Classical AI and its Rationalist Assumptions. Minds and Machines 18 (2):227-238.
Gabriel Gottlieb (2011). Unreflective Action and the Argument From Speed. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3):338-362.
Hubert L. Dreyfus & Stuart E. Dreyfus (1991). Towards a Phenomenology of Ethical Expertise. Human Studies 14 (4):229 - 250.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (2002). Intelligence Without Representation: Merleau-Ponty's Critique of Mental Representation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1:367-83.
Philip Brey (2001). Hubert Dreyfus: Humans Versus Computers. In American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Jonathan Lear (2009). Response to Hubert Dreyfus and Nancy Sherman. Philosophical Studies 144 (1):81 - 93.
Added to index2010-09-01
Total downloads3 ( #517,470 of 1,781,487 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #295,005 of 1,781,487 )
How can I increase my downloads?