On extremal axioms
History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):67-85 (1981)
| Abstract | In the paper translated here, Carnap and Bachmann shows that the apparently metalinguistic ?extremal' axioms that are added to some axiom systems to the effect that the foregoing axioms are to apply as broadly, or as narrowly, as possible may be formulated directly as proper axioms. They analyze such axioms into four fundamental types, with the help of a concept of ?complete? isomorphism | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSusan Rogerson & Greg Restall (2004). Routes to Triviality. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (4):421-436.
Charles Sayward (2005). Why Axiomatize Arithmetic? Sorites 16:54-61.
Patrick Maher (2002). Joyce's Argument for Probabilism. Philosophy of Science 69 (1):73-81.
R. D. Kopperman (1981). First-Order Topological Axioms. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (3):475-489.
Kenny Easwaran (2008). The Role of Axioms in Mathematics. Erkenntnis 68 (3):381 - 391.
T. Thacher Robinson (1968). Independence of Two Nice Sets of Axioms for the Propositional Calculus. Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (2):265-270.
Louis Narens (1974). Measurement Without Archimedean Axioms. Philosophy of Science 41 (4):374-393.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads14 ( #84,198 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,807 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
