Reply to Jackson, II

Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):196-198 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Commonsense psychological explanations are an integral part of a comprehensive commonsense background that includes almost everything that we deal with everyday— from traffic jams to paychecks to cozy dinners for two. It is the comprehensive commonsense background that I think is not wholesale refutable by science. A good deal of the comprehensive commonsense background itself depends on there being beliefs, desires, intentions and other propositional attitudes. If there never have been propositional attitudes, then there never have been statues or schools or terrorists or Nobel prizes. Since I think it unreasonable to suppose that science will reveal that there never has been a statue, or a school or a terrorist or a Nobel prize, I also think it unreasonable to suppose that science will reveal that nobody has ever had a belief, desire, intention or other propositional attitude.1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Jackson, I.Jennifer Hornsby - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):193-195.
Jackson’s Empirical Assumptions. [REVIEW]Stephen Stich & Jonathan M. Weinberg - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):637-643.
Mind, morality, and explanation: selected collaborations.Frank Jackson - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Philip Pettit & Michael Smith.
Jackson's apostasy.William S. Robinson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 111 (3):277-293.
Reply to Jackson's "Block's challenge".David M. Armstrong - 1993 - In John Bacon, Keith Campbell & Lloyd Reinhardt (eds.), Ontology, Causality and Mind: Essays in Honour of D.M. Armstrong. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
40 (#387,619)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lynne Rudder Baker
PhD: Vanderbilt University; Last affiliation: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Citations of this work

Attention, time & purpose.Michael Luntley - 2003 - Philosophical Explorations 6 (1):2 – 17.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Replies.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):623-635.
Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):127-129.

View all 9 references / Add more references