Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):370-388 (2002)
|Abstract||Throughout his illustrious career, Roderick Chisholm was concerned with the nature of persons. On his view, persons are what he called ‘entia per se.’ They exist per se, in their own right. I too have developed an account of persons—I call it the ‘Constitution View’—an account that is different in important ways from Chisholm’s. Here, however, I want to focus on a thesis that Chisholm and I agree on: that persons have ontological significance in virtue of being persons. Although I’ll make the notion of ontological significance more precise later, the rough idea is that Fs (persons, or whatever) have ontological significance just in case a new F is a new thing and not just a change in some already-existing thing|
|Keywords||Metaphysics Ontology Person Status Chisholm, R|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lynne Rudder Baker (2008). “Tätigsein Und Die Erste-Person-Perspektive” (Agency and the First-Person Perspective). In Bruno Niederbacher & Edmund Runggaldier (eds.), Was Sind Menschliche Personen? Onto Verlag.
William Hasker (2004). The Constitution View of Persons. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):23-34.
Ernest Sosa (1999). The Essentials of Persons. Dialectica 53 (3-4):227-41.
Christopher McMahon (1995). The Ontological and Moral Status of Organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):541-554.
Robert A. Wilson (2005). Persons, Social Agency, and Constitution. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2):49-69.
William Hasker (2004). The Constitution View of Persons: A Critique. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):23-34.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2000). Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge University Press.
Lynne Baker (2007). Persons and Other Things. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 5-6):17-36.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads65 ( #16,935 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,644 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?