Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1329-1342 (2003)
|Abstract||If a classical system has infinitely many degrees of freedom, its Hamiltonian quantization need not be unique up to unitary equivalence. I sketch different approaches (Hilbert space and algebraic) to understanding the content of quantum theories in light of this non‐uniqueness, and suggest that neither approach suffices to support explanatory aspirations encountered in the thermodynamic limit of quantum statistical mechanics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
G. Hooft (2001). Obstacles on the Way Towards the Quantisation of Space, Time and Matter - and Possible Resolutions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (2):157-180.
Laura Ruetsche (2002). Interpreting Quantum Field Theory. Philosophy of Science 69 (2):348-378.
Hans Primas & Michael Esfeld, A Critical Review of Wigner's Work on the Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Theory.
Alexey Kryukov (2007). On the Measurement Problem for a Two-Level Quantum System. Foundations of Physics 37 (1):3-39.
Alfred Landé (1962). The Case Against Quantum Duality. Philosophy of Science 29 (1):1-6.
Steven French (2012). Unitary Inequivalence as a Problem for Structural Realism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 43 (2):121-136.
Laura Ruetsche (2003). A Matter of Degree: Putting Unitary Inequivalence to Work. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1329-1342.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #28,948 of 722,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)35 ( #3,217 of 722,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?