David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2011)
Traditionally, philosophers of quantum mechanics have addressed exceedingly simple systems: a pair of electrons in an entangled state, or an atom and a cat in Dr. Schrodinger's diabolical device. But recently, much more complicated systems, such as quantum fields and the infinite systems at the thermodynamic limit of quantum statistical mechanics, have attracted, and repaid, philosophical attention. Interpreting Quantum Theories has three entangled aims. The first is to guide those familiar with the philosophy of ordinary QM into the philosophy of 'QM infinity', by presenting accessible introductions to relevant technical notions and the foundational questions they frame. The second aim is to develop and defend answers to some of those questions. Does quantum field theory demand or deserve a particle ontology? How (if at all) are different states of broken symmetry different? And what is the proper role of idealizations in working physics? The third aim is to highlight ties between the foundational investigation of QM infinity and philosophy more broadly construed, in particular by using the interpretive problems discussed to motivate new ways to think about the nature of physical possibility and the problem of scientific realism.
|Keywords||Quantum Field Theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$24.51 used (73% off) $28.80 new (68% off) $90.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||QC174.12.R848 2011|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gordon Belot (2012). Quantum States for Primitive Ontologists: A Case Study. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):67-83.
Lydia Patton (2015). Methodological Realism and Modal Resourcefulness: Out of the Web and Into the Mine. Synthese 192 (11):3443-3462.
Benjamin C. Jantzen, Deborah G. Mayo & Lydia Patton (2015). Ontology & Methodology. Synthese 192 (11):3413-3423.
Simon Friederich (2013). Gauge Symmetry Breaking in Gauge Theories—in Search of Clarification. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (2):157-182.
Laura Ruetsche (2015). The Shaky Game +25, Or: On Locavoracity. Synthese 192 (11):3425-3442.
Similar books and articles
Hans Halvorson (2013). Ruetsche on the Pristine and Adulterated in Quantum Field Theory. Metascience 22 (1):69-75.
Simon Friederich (2013). Pristinism Under Pressure: Ruetsche on the Interpretation of Quantum Theories. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 78 (5):1205-1212.
Don Robinson (1994). The History and Philosophy of Quantum Field Theory. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:61 - 68.
Allen Stairs & Jeffrey Bub (2013). Correlations, Contextuality and Quantum Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (3):483-499.
Laura Ruetsche (2002). Interpreting Quantum Field Theory. Philosophy of Science 69 (2):348-378.
Alexei Grinbaum (2007). Reconstruction of Quantum Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):387 - 408.
J. Bub (2000). Quantum Mechanics as a Principle Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (1):75-94.
J. E. Baggott (2004). Beyond Measure: Modern Physics, Philosophy, and the Meaning of Quantum Theory. Oxford University Press.
Joseph Berkovitz (2000). The Nature of Causality in Quantum Phenomena. Theoria 15 (1):87-122.
Franck Laloë (2012). Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics? Cambridge University Press.
E. B. Davies (2005). Some Remarks on the Foundations of Quantum Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):521-539.
Added to index2011-08-24
Total downloads77 ( #51,935 of 1,790,295 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #141,142 of 1,790,295 )
How can I increase my downloads?