British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):93-112 (1996)
|Abstract||Philosophers like Duhem and Cartwright have argued that there is a tension between laws' abilities to explain and to represent. Abstract laws exemplify the first quality, phenomenological laws the second. This view has both metaphysical and methodological aspects: the world is too complex to be represented by simple theories; supplementing simple theories to make them represent reality blocks their confirmation. We argue that both aspects are incompatible with recent developments in nonlinear dynamics. Confirmation procedures and modelling strategies in nonlinear dynamics show that there are simple, abstract theories that can be confirmed without encountering the problems pointed to by Cartwright.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael A. Raffanti (2006). Theoretical Synergy: Evolving Understanding of Organizational Diversity Dynamics. World Futures 62 (7):551 – 560.
Jakob Hohwy (2003). Capacities, Explanation and the Possibility of Disunity. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):179 – 190.
Anand Pillay (1998). Definability and Definable Groups in Simple Theories. Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (3):788-796.
Douglas Patterson (2007). Inconsistency Theories: The Significance of Semantic Ascent. Inquiry 50 (6):575-589.
Stephen H. Kellert (2001). Extrascientific Uses of Physics: The Case of Nonlinear Dynamics and Legal Theory. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S455-.
Helena Knyazeva (2009). Nonlinear Cobweb of Cognition. Foundations of Science 14 (3):167-179.
J. Barkley Rosser, Complex Ecologic-Economic Dynamics and Environmental Policy Forthcoming, Ecological Economics.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #35,862 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)29 ( #4,241 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?