David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 52 (2):239-252 (2000)
Matthias Schirn has argued on a number of occasions against the interpretation of Frege's ``objects of a quite special kind'' (i.e., the objects referred to by names like `the concept F') as extensions of concepts. According to Schirn, not only are these objects not extensions, but also the idea that `the concept F' refers to objects leads to some conclusions that are counter-intuitive and incompatible with Frege's thought. In this paper, I challenge Schirn's conclusion: I want to try and argue that the assumption that `the concept F' refers to the extension of F is entirely consistent with Frege's broader views on logic and language. I shall examine each of Schirn's main arguments and show that they do not support his claim.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Ethics Logic Ontology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Beaney (2007). Frege's Use of Function-Argument Analysis and His Introduction of Truth-Values as Objects. Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (1):93-123.
Marco Ruffino (2003). Why Frege Would Not Be a Neo-Fregean. Mind 112 (445):51-78.
David J. Anderson & Edward N. Zalta (2004). Frege, Boolos, and Logical Objects. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (1):1-26.
Matthias Schirn (1990). Frege's Objects of a Quite Special Kind. Erkenntnis 32 (1):27 - 60.
Terence Parsons (1986). Why Frege Should Not Have Said "The Concept Horse is Not a Concept". History of Philosophy Quarterly 3 (4):449 - 465.
William Demopoulus & William Bell (1993). Frege's Theory of Concepts and Objects and the Interpretation of Second-Order Logict. Philosophia Mathematica 1 (2):139-156.
Mark Textor (2010). Frege's Concept Paradox and the Mirroring Principle. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):126-148.
Joan Weiner (2007). What's in a Numeral? Frege's Answer. Mind 116 (463):677 - 716.
Matthias Schirn (2006). Concepts, Extensions, and Frege's Logicist Project. Mind 115 (460):983-1006.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #93,992 of 1,679,367 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #78,612 of 1,679,367 )
How can I increase my downloads?