Graduate studies at Western
Mind 112 (445):51-78 (2003)
|Abstract||In this paper, I seek to clarify an aspect of Frege's thought that has been only insufficiently explained in the literature, namely, his notion of logical objects. I adduce some elements of Frege's philosophy that elucidate why he saw extensions as natural candidates for paradigmatic cases of logical objects. Moreover, I argue (against the suggestion of some contemporary scholars, in particular, Wright and Boolos) that Frege could not have taken Hume's Principle instead of Axiom V as a fundamental law of arithmetic. This would be inconsistent with his views on logical objects. Finally, I shall argue that there is a connection between Frege's view on this topic and the famous thesis first formulated in ‘Über Begriff und Gegenstand’ that ‘the concept horse is not a concept’. As far as I know, no due attention has been given to this connection in the scholarly literature so far.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
G. Aldo Antonelli & Robert C. May (2000). Frege's New Science. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):242-270.
G. Aldo Antonelli & Robert C. May (2005). Frege's Other Program. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (1):1-17.
Carlo Penco (2003). Frege: Two Theses, Two Senses. History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (2):87-109.
Rosemarie Rheinwald (1997). Paradoxien Und Die Vergegenständlichung Von Begriffen – Zu Freges Unterscheidung Zwischen Begriff – Und Gegenstand. Erkenntnis 47 (1):7-35.
Sanford Shieh (2008). Frege on Definitions. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):992-1012.
Marco Ruffino (2000). Extensions as Representative Objects in Frege's Logic. Erkenntnis 52 (2):239-252.
Matthias Schirn (2006). Concepts, Extensions, and Frege's Logicist Project. Mind 115 (460):983-1006.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #27,437 of 739,052 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,701 of 739,052 )
How can I increase my downloads?