Graduate studies at Western
Law and Philosophy 16 (5):479 - 505 (1997)
|Abstract||The author investigates how the conception of legal validity as a specific mode of existence, adopted by Kelsen in Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (General Theory of Norms), can be reconciled with a conception of the legal system in which conflicts of legal norms remain of logical concern. To this end he makes use of Ludwig Wittgenstein's picture theory of the proposition as set out in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. The conclusion is that in order to reconcile the two conceptions, the legal system itself must be conceived of as consisting of three sub-systems, namely, (i) a sub-system of perceptible legal judgments, (ii) a sub-system of valid legal conditions, and (iii) a sub-system of observable social practices.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Riccardo Guastini (2000). On Legal Order: Some Criticism of the Received View. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):263-272.
Joseph Raz (1980). The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System. Oxford University Press.
Dick W. P. Ruiter (1998). Structuring Legal Institutions. Law and Philosophy 17 (3):215 - 232.
P. W. (1998). Structuring Legal Institutions. Law and Philosophy 17 (3):215-232.
Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni B. Ratti (2010). Validity and Defeasibility in the Legal Domain. Law and Philosophy 29 (5):601 - 626.
M. Baurmann (2000). Legal Authority as a Social Fact. Law and Philosophy 19 (2):247-262.
P. W. (1997). Legal Validity Qua Specific Mode of Existence. Law and Philosophy 16 (5):479-505.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,097 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?