Nominalismo, voluntarismo y contingentismo: la crítica de L. Polo a las nociones centrales de Ockham

Studia Poliana 9:155-190 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper reviews te principal points of Okcham’s philosophy: representationism, voluntarism, contingentism, and also the critics that Polo makes to them. The three parts of the study are: theory of knowledge, ethics-psychology, and metaphysics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

La crítica de Polo al argumento anselmiano.Miguel Ángel Balibrea - 1996 - Anuario Filosófico 29 (55):373-380.
El intelecto agente como acto de ser personal.Juan Fernando Sellés - 2012 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 45:35-63.
Los hábitos intelectuales según Polo.Juan Fernando Sellés - 1996 - Anuario Filosófico 29 (55):1017-1036.
La crítica de Pedro Abelardo a otros nominalismos.María José García Encinas - 2005 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 12:179-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
8 (#1,138,679)

6 months
2 (#670,035)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references