Seeing Meaning: Frege and Derrida on Ideality and the Limits of Husserlian Intuitionism [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Husserl Studies 27 (1):63-81 (2011)
|Abstract||The article seeks to challenge the standard accounts of how to view the difference between Husserl and Frege on the nature of ideal objects and meanings. It does so partly by using Derrida’s deconstructive reading of Husserl to open up a critical space where the two approaches can be confronted in a new way. Frege’s criticism of Husserl’s philosophy of mathematics (that it was essentially psychologistic) was partly overcome by the program of transcendental phenomenology. But the original challenge to the prospect of a fulfilled intuition of idealities remained and was in fact encountered again from within the transcendental analysis by Husserl himself in his last writings on geometry and language. According to the two standard and conflicting accounts, Husserl either changed his earlier psychologistic program as a result of Frege’s criticism, or he was in fact never challenged by it in the first place. The article shows instead how Husserl continued to struggle with the problem of the constitution of ideal objects, and how his quest led him to a point where his analyses anticipate a more dialectical and deconstructive conclusion, eventually made explicit by Derrida. It also shows not only how this development constitutes a philosophical continuity from the original dispute with Frege, but also how Frege’s critique in a certain respect could be read as an anticipation of Derrida’s deconstructive elaboration of Husserl’s phenomenology|
|Keywords||Ideal objects Intuition Psychologism Genetic phenomenology Deconstruction Husserl Frege Derrida|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wayne M. Martin (1999). Husserl's Relapse? Concerning a Fregean Challenge to Phenomenology. Inquiry 42 (3 & 4):343 – 369.
Nam-In Lee (2010). Phenomenology of Language Beyond the Deconstructive Philosophy of Language. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):465-481.
Robin Durie (2008). At the Same Time. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (1):73-88.
Joshua L. Kates (2003). Derrida, Husserl, and the Commentators: Introducing a Developmental Approach. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 19 (2):101-129.
Martin Schwab (2006). The Fate of Phenomenology in Deconstruction: Derrida and Husserl. Inquiry 49 (4):353 – 379.
Mirja Hartimo (2006). Mathematical Roots of Phenomenology: Husserl and the Concept of Number. History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (4):319-337.
Paola Marrati (2005). Genesis and Trace: Derrida Reading Husserl and Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
Joshua Kates (2008). Fielding Derrida: Philosophy, Literary Criticism, History, and the Work of Deconstruction. Fordham University Press.
Claire Ortiz Hill (2002). Tackling Three of Frege's Problems: Edmund Husserl on Sets and Manifolds. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 13 (1):79-104.
Tim Mooney (1999). Derrida's Empirical Realism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (5):33-56.
Matt Taylor (2000). The Consistency of Husserl's Theory of Meaning. Grazer Philosophische Studien 60:171-195.
Steven Crowell (2011). Retrieving Husserl's Phenomenology. New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 11:297-311.
Jack W. Meiland (1976). Psychologism in Logic: Husserl's Critique. Inquiry 19 (1-4):325 – 339.
Added to index2010-12-20
Total downloads34 ( #40,650 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?