Co-ordination principles: A reply
Mind 117 (468):1059-1063 (2008)
| Abstract | I explain why Fernando Ferreira's interesting formal result does not threaten the bilateralist account of the sense of the connectives | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesIan Rumfitt (2002). Unilateralism Disarmed: A Reply to Dummett and Gibbard. Mind 111 (442):305-322.
Ian Rumfitt (1999). Logic and Existence: Ian Rumfitt. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):151–180.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2008). Postscript to Why Truthmakers. In E. J. Lowe & A. Rami (eds.), Truth and Truth-making. Acumen.
Duncan MacIntosh (1992). Buridan and the Circumstances of Justice (On the Implications of the Rational Unsolvability of Certain Co-Ordination Problems). Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2):150-173.
David Shatz (1986). Circularity and Epistemic Principles: A Reply to James Keller. Synthese 68 (2):369 - 382.
Ronald M. Green (1997). Guiding Principles of Jewish Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (2):21-30.
Jonathan Gelati, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor & Guido Governatori (2004). Normative Autonomy and Normative Co-Ordination: Declarative Power, Representation, and Mandate. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (1-2):53-81.
Patrick G. T. Healey (2004). Dialogue in the Degenerate Case? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-201.
Fernando Ferreira (2008). The Co-Ordination Principles: A Problem for Bilateralism. Mind 117 (468):1051-1057.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads36 ( #33,057 of 549,359 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,359 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
