David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Longwood Press (1937)
By what process of development he came to this opinion, though in itself an important and interesting question, is logically irrelevant to the inquiry how far the opinion itself is correct ; and among his opinions, when these have been ascertained, it becomes desirable to prune away such as seem inconsistent with his main doctrines, before those doctrines themselves are subjected to a critical scrutiny. Philosophic truth and falsehood, in short, rather than historical fact, are what primarily demand our attention in this inquiry.
|Keywords||Bertrand Russell Leibniz|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$21.05 new (13% off) $25.11 used (9% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B2598.R83 1989|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
A. E. Taylor (1901). Book Review:A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibnitz. Bertrand Russell. [REVIEW] Ethics 11 (4):521-.
Bertrand Russell (ed.) (1973). Bertrand Russell, the Social Scientist. Bertrand Russell Supranational Society.
Alan Schwerin (ed.) (2008). Russell Revisited: Critical Reflections on the Thought of Bertrand Russell. Cambridge Scholars Pub..
Harry G. Frankfurt (1972). Leibniz. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Paul Arthur Schilpp (1952). The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell. New York, Tudor Pub. Co..
Harry G. Frankfurt (1976). Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
T. Allan Hillman (2008). The Early Russell on the Metaphysics of Substance in Leibniz and Bradley. Synthese 163 (2):245 - 261.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #42,138 of 1,005,816 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,266 of 1,005,816 )
How can I increase my downloads?