Graduate studies at Western
In Charles Pigden (ed.), Hume on Is and Ought. Palgrave MacMillan (forthcoming)
|Abstract||An argument defending the view that one cannot derive an ought from an is against the usual (suspect) counterexamples.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Antony Lamb (2008). Self-Determination, Wellbeing, and Threats of Harm. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):145–158.
Roger S. Woolhouse (1972). From Conceivability to Possibility. Ratio 14:144--154.
Jeffrey Ketland (2002). Hume = Small Hume. Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
Ian Howard Dennis (2009). On Necessity as a Defence to Crime: Possibilities, Problems and the Limits of Justification and Excuse. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):29-49.
Saul Traiger (2000). Hume's Defence of Causal Inference. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 26 (2):350-353.
Campbell Brown (forthcoming). Minding the Is-Ought Gap. Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-17.
Gillian Russell & Greg Restall (forthcoming). Barriers to Implication. In Charles Pigden (ed.), Hume on Is and Ought. Palgrave MacMillan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #18,783 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,029 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?