David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (2):127-163 (2012)
This paper explores the question of what logic is not. It argues against the wide spread assumptions that logic is: a model of reason; a model of correct reason; the laws of thought, or indeed is related to reason at all such that the essential nature of the two are crucially or essentially co-illustrative. I note that due to such assumptions, our current understanding of the nature of logic itself is thoroughly entangled with the nature of reason. I show that most arguments for the presence of any sort of essential re- lationship between logic and reason face intractable problems and demands, and fall well short of addressing them. These arguments include those for the notion that logic is normative for reason (or that logic and correct reason are in some way the same thing), that logic is some sort of description of correct reason and that logic is an abstracted or idealised version of correct reason. A strong version of logical realism is put forward as an alternative view, and is briefly explored.
|Keywords||reason psychology mathematics thought logic cognitive science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
George Santayana (1905/1998). The Life of Reason. Prometheus Books.
Andrew Aberdein (2008). Logic for Dogs. In Steven D. Hales (ed.), What Philosophy Can Tell You About Your Dog. Open Court. 167-181.
Marc Pauly & Rohit Parikh (2003). Game Logic - an Overview. Studia Logica 75 (2):165 - 182.
Shawn Hedman (2004). A First Course in Logic: An Introduction to Model Theory, Proof Theory, Computability, and Complexity. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Nagel (1997). The Last Word. OUP USA.
R. Westmoreland (1999). The Truth About Public Reason. Law and Philosophy 18 (3):271-296.
Joshua Schechter (2013). Could Evolution Explain Our Reliability About Logic? In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology 4. 214.
T. Achourioti & M. van Lambalgen (2011). A Formalization of Kant's Transcendental Logic. Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (2):254-289.
Edward Grant (2001). God and Reason in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.
Charles L. Stevenson (1970). If-Iculties. Philosophy of Science 37 (1):27-49.
Added to index2012-03-26
Total downloads56 ( #30,701 of 1,102,035 )
Recent downloads (6 months)22 ( #9,321 of 1,102,035 )
How can I increase my downloads?