David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 46 (3):655-672 (2011)
Abstract. I respond to the criticisms of David Wisdo of my position on the relationship between science and religion. I argue that although he gives a full and fair account of my position, he fails to grasp fully my use of the metaphorical basis of modern science in my argument that, because of its mechanistic commitment, there are some questions that science not only does not answer but that science does not even attempt to answer. Hence, my position stands and plays a crucial role in our understanding of the science–religion relationship.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Daniel C. Dennett (1996). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):169-174.
Citations of this work BETA
Iris Fry (2012). Is Science Metaphysically Neutral? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (3):665-673.
Iris Fry (2012). Is Science Metaphysically Neutral? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (3):665-673.
Similar books and articles
Edward Schoen (2011). Michael Ruse, Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):97-101.
David Wisdo (2011). Michael Ruse on Science and Faith: Seeking Mutual Understanding. Zygon 46 (3):639-654.
James F. Moore (2010). Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. By Michael Ruse. Zygon 45 (4):1023-1024.
Logan Paul Gage (2012). Michael Ruse: Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. [REVIEW] Religious Studies Review 38 (1):10.
Andrew Pinsent (2012). Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. By Michael Ruse. (Cambridge UP, 2010. Pp 264. Price £20.99.). [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):438-441.
W. E. Mann (2012). Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. Philosophical Review 121 (2):302-304.
David Wisdo (1987). Kierkegaard on Belief, Faith, and Explanation. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21 (2):95 - 114.
David W. Rutledge (1998). “Beyond Logic and Beneath Will”. Tradition and Discovery 25 (2):20-29.
David Wisdo (1988). The Fragility of Faith: Toward a Critique of Reformed Epistemology. Religious Studies 24 (3):365 - 374.
Callum David Scott, Fides Et Ratio : An Investigation Into the Relationship Between Science and Religion.
Rafael A. Martínez (2013). Making Room for Faith in Science: The Role of Metaphors and Reason. [REVIEW] Metascience 22 (2):431-434.
Stephen R. L. Clark (2010). Review of Michael Ruse, Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).
Michael Ruse (1984). Biological Science and Feminist Values. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:525 - 542.
Michael Naas (2009). Miracle and Machine: The Two Sources of Religion and Science in Derrida's "Faith and Knowledge". Research in Phenomenology 39 (2):184-203.
David Wisdo (1991). Kierkegaard on the Limits of Christian Epistemology. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 29 (2):97 - 112.
Added to index2011-08-13
Total downloads141 ( #24,833 of 1,790,387 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #40,239 of 1,790,387 )
How can I increase my downloads?