|Abstract||The Agency and the Manipulability theory of causation, in spite of significant differences, share at least three claims. First, that manipulation – roughly, that by manipulating causes we bring about effects – is a central notion for causation; second, that such a notion of manipulation allows a reductive – i.e. general and comprehensive – account of causation; third, that this view has its forefathers in the works of Collingwood, Gasking and von Wright. This paper mainly challenges the third claim and argues that the misreading of those authors leads to a more dangerous consequence: a confusion between epistemological, metaphysical and methodological issues about causation|
|Keywords||Collingwood Philosophy of Science|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Markus E. Schlosser (2008). Agent-Causation and Agential Control. Philosophical Explorations 11 (1):3-21.
Patrick Forber & Kenneth Reisman (2007). Can There Be Stochastic Evolutionary Causes? Philosophy of Science 74 (5):616-627.
Brad Weslake (2006). Review of Making Things Happen. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):136-140.
Richard Otte (1987). Indeterminism, Counterfactuals, and Causation. Philosophy of Science 54 (1):45-62.
James Woodward, Causation and Manipulability. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Peter Menzies & Huw Price (1993). Causation as a Secondary Quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):187-203.
Peter Menzies & Huw Price (1993). Causation as a Secondary Quality. BJPS 44 (2):187-203.
Huw Price (1993). Causation as a Secondary Quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):187 - 203.
Daniel M. Hausman (1997). Causation, Agency, and Independence. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):25.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #49,632 of 549,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?