Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The Agency and the Manipulability theory of causation, in spite of significant differences, share at least three claims. First, that manipulation – roughly, that by manipulating causes we bring about effects – is a central notion for causation; second, that such a notion of manipulation allows a reductive – i.e. general and comprehensive – account of causation; third, that this view has its forefathers in the works of Collingwood, Gasking and von Wright. This paper mainly challenges the third claim and argues that the misreading of those authors leads to a more dangerous consequence: a confusion between epistemological, metaphysical and methodological issues about causation|
|Keywords||Collingwood Philosophy of Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Markus E. Schlosser (2008). Agent-Causation and Agential Control. Philosophical Explorations 11 (1):3-21.
Huw Price (1993). Causation as a Secondary Quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):187 - 203.
Peter Menzies & Huw Price (1993). Causation as a Secondary Quality. BJPS 44 (2):187-203.
Peter Menzies & Huw Price (1993). Causation as a Secondary Quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):187-203.
James Woodward, Causation and Manipulability. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Richard Otte (1987). Indeterminism, Counterfactuals, and Causation. Philosophy of Science 54 (1):45-62.
Brad Weslake (2006). Review of Making Things Happen. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):136-140.
Patrick Forber & Kenneth Reisman (2007). Can There Be Stochastic Evolutionary Causes? Philosophy of Science 74 (5):616-627.
Daniel M. Hausman (1997). Causation, Agency, and Independence. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):25.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #50,058 of 750,480 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #38,076 of 750,480 )
How can I increase my downloads?