On the notion of cause

In Mysticism and Logic. Pelican Books. 171-196 (1953)
Abstract
El autor intenta mostrar que el concepto de ley es totalmente innecesario y que solo sirve para crear confusiones y generar falacias. Para ello muestra que la supuesta “ley de la causalidad” es inconsistente y que la ciencia no requiere de ella más que en una primera fase. Las ciencias maduras usan relaciones, en concreto, relaciones mediante ecuaciones diferenciales para desempe\ nar el papel que se le quiere otorgar a la ley de la causalidad. Despues de hacer esto, el autor presenta varias confusiones relacionadas con el concepto de causa, y su solución si se asume lo anteriormente dicho
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Christoph Hoerl (2011). Causal Reasoning. Philosophical Studies 152 (2):167-179.

View all 9 citations

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-04-07

Total downloads

130 ( #6,219 of 1,096,450 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

25 ( #3,918 of 1,096,450 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.