Prologue
| Abstract | I don't want your agreement! I think I would prefer your understanding. Your agreement would be useful in a workplace to achieve a task. But that is not a social system. We want to live together in mutual respect. Your agreement would take hold of me and threaten to devour my own being - just as my agreement would do to you. For we each bring forth our own world in our every present moment. No matter how convenient it may seem to be, I cannot truly stand still - with you or anyone. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesIngrid Harris (1994). “Instincts Into Sacred Cows”: Are Hermeneutical Universalsreducibleto Agreement? Reply to Friedman. Critical Review 8 (1):113-136.
Kent Bach (1995). Terms of Agreement. Ethics 105 (3):604-612.
George Rudebusch (1986). Hoffman on Kripke's Wittgenstein. Philosophical Research Archives 12:177-182.
Martin Gunderson (1979). Threats and Coercion. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):247 - 259.
Miguel Ruiz (2010). The Fifth Agreement: A Practical Guide to Self-Mastery. Distributed by Hay House.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-10-25Total downloads2 ( #232,628 of 549,578 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
