Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (9):1043-1051 (2011)
|Abstract||Nikolas Kompridis' Critique and Disclosure is a sustained argument for the proposition that critical social theory in the tradition of the Frankfurt School is best carried forward by rejecting central aspects of Habermas' neo-Kantian version of it. The most promising future direction for critical theory according to Kompridis involves a reconsideration of the resources of hermeneutic phenomenology, especially renewed attention to the Heideggerian concept ‘disclosure’. To this end, Kompridis develops a distinctive dialectical version of this concept. I agree that Kantian versions of critical theory are philosophically suspect, and that critical theory is most conceptually vital and politically trenchant when turned away from ‘discourse ethics' and the like. I am a bit less sanguine than is Kompridis with a turn to Heidegger, however, and raise several issues having to do with that aspect of Kompridis' account. This caution is not rooted simply in the historical fact that critical theory from its inception has attempted to immunize itself against phenomenology; it is rather a conceptual matter. In my judgment, Kompridis does not need to develop, as he does, an intricate account of overlap between what he holds best about critical theory and Heidegger’s ontology. If one were looking for historical antecedents that do not come freighted with what Horkheimer derided as ‘irrationalism’, one would do better to investigate early German Romanticism, in which there is an explicitly interpretive yet dialectical methodology on offer. Moreover, the central doctrines of Jena Romanticism exhibit more positive points of contact with the earlier, more skeptical forms of critical theory that Kompridis might favor, e.g. Adorno’s|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
R. Sinnerbrink (2011). The Future of Critical Theory? Kompridis on World-Disclosing Critique. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (9):1053-1061.
M. Schoolman (2011). Situating Receptivity: From Critique to 'Reflective Disclosure'. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (9):1033-1041.
Nikolas Kompridis (2004). From Reason to Self-Realisation? Axel Honneth and the 'Ethical Turn' in Critical Theory. Critical Horizons 5 (1):323-360.
A. Allen (2011). The Power of Disclosure: Comments on Nikolas Kompridis' Critique and Disclosure. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (9):1025-1031.
Kudzai Matereke (2012). Rethinking Receptivity in a Postcolonial Context: Recasting Sembène'sMoolaade. Ethics and Global Politics 5 (3):pp. 153-170.
Robert Sinnerbrink (2010). Nikolas Kompridis, Critique and Disclosure: Critical Theory Between Past and Future (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006), Hardback, Isbn 978-0-262-11299-4, 337 Pages, $37.50/£24.05. [REVIEW] Critical Horizons 8 (2).
Fred Dallmayr (2009). Review of Nikolas Kompridis, Critique and Disclosure: Critical Theory Between Past and Future. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (2).
Nikolas Kompridis (2013). The Priority of Receptivity to Creativity (Or: I Trusted You with the Idea of Me and You Lost It). Critical Horizons 13 (3):337 - 350.
Nikolas Kompridis (2005). Rethinking Critical Theory. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (3):299 – 301.
Nikolas Kompridis (2005). Disclosing Possibility: The Past and Future of Critical Theory. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (3):325 – 351.
Robert Sinnerbrink (2012). Critical Theory As Disclosing Critique: A Response to Kompridis. Constellations 19 (3):369-381.
Albena Azmanova (2012). The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment. Columbia University Press.
John Abromeit (2011). Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press.
Andrew Bowie (1997). From Romanticism to Critical Theory: The Philosophy of German Literary Theory. Routledge.
Added to index2011-08-26
Total downloads6 ( #145,729 of 549,521 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?