Remarks on Bolzano's Conception of Necessary Truth

This essay presents a new interpretation of Bolzano's account of necessary truth as set out in ?182 of the Theory of Science. According to this interpretation, Bolzano's conception is closely related to that of Leibniz, with some important differences. In the first place, Bolzano's conception of necessary truth embraces not only what Leibniz called metaphysical or brute necessities but also moral necessities (truths grounded in God's choice of the best among all metaphysical possibilities). Second, in marked contrast to Leibniz, Bolzano maintains that there is still plenty of room for contingency even on this broader conception of necessity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2012.679783
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,831
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Bernard Bolzano (2001). Wissenschaftslehre. [REVIEW] Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (18):134-136.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Mark Textor (2013). Bolzano on the Source of Necessity: A Reply to Rusnock. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):381 - 392.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Paul Rusnock (2013). On Bolzano's Concept of a Sum. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):155 - 169.
Dariusz Lukasiewicz (2007). Logical and Metaphysical Assumptions of Bernard Bolzano's Theodicy. Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 12 (1):33 - 56.
Paola Cantù, Bolzano Versus Kant: Mathematics as a Scientia Universalis. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan.
Andrej Krause (2006). Are Bolzano's Substances Simple? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):543-562.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

16 ( #163,725 of 1,724,748 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,121 of 1,724,748 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.