David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 44 (2):201 – 222 (2001)
Beginning with his work in the mid-1930s, Heidegger's later thought is generally considered to pose severe interpretative difficulties, even for those well acquainted with Being and Time. It is often claimed that his later thought either defies reconstruction because of its arcane nature or that it should not be reconstructed because doing so compromises its subtleties. It is argued that this 'availability problem' with Heidegger's later thought is not insurmountable, at least not with regard to one of its major strands, his views on the relation of art to truth. An interpretation of 'The Origin of the Work of Art' is proposed that views its major arguments as extensions of Heidegger's view on truth and the nature of worlds in Being and Time. To this end, a new account of the relationship of two pairs of terms crucial to the understanding of the ontological significance of the work of art and its truth is offered: (a) 'earth' and 'world' and (b) 'concealment' and 'un-concealment'. What emerges is a Kant-like claim that a necessary condition for the possibility of worlds is that things stand to be taken up into worlds in virtue of a character they have abstracted from their involvements in any one world. Artworks, if they are 'true' art, show this by allowing the thing that they are to support a wide range of possible understandings, displaying the fact that no one set of understandings can exhaust the 'thingly' nature of the work. In addition to clarifying that aspect of Heidegger's account of truth that requires un-concealment to depend on residual concealment, this understanding of the structure of the artwork accounts for the power Heidegger ascribes to certain art to inaugurate worlds. I conclude by making some suggestions, against the background of the interpretation of the art essay, on how to understand the 'turn' in Heidegger's thought as a deepening inquiry into the nature of truth.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael D. Robinson (2009). Truth in Metaphysics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):467-490.
Iain Thomson (2010). Heidegger's Aesthetics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mark A. Wrathall (1999). Heidegger and Truth as Correspondence. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):69 – 88.
James Magrini (2009). Truth, Art, and the “New Sensuousness”: Understanding Heidegger's Metaphysical Reading of Nietzsche. Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):116-138.
James Magrini, The Origin of the Work of Art: Historicality, Temporality, and Destiny in Heidegger's Philosophy of the 1930s.
John Sallis (ed.) (1970). Heidegger and the Path of Thinking. Pittsburgh,Duquesne University Press.
Shane Mackinlay (2010). Heidegger's Temple: How Truth Happens When Nothing is Portrayed. Sophia 49 (4):499-507.
Andrea Rehberg (2009). The World and the Work of Art. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):131-142.
Julian Young (2004). Heidegger's Philosophy of Art. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #216,825 of 1,934,805 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #196,346 of 1,934,805 )
How can I increase my downloads?