An ethical dilemma: Information control in cancer care [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics Quarterly 2 (3):148-158 (1980)
Cancer is a group of diseases that are complicated by various treatment choices available. Information exchange between a patient and physician is critical in helping people to understand what is happening to them and what options for therapy are recommended and available. When information is not exchanged, information control by one or both of the participants occurs. Information needs to be taken into account by both health care professional and patients in making decisions during the crucial phases of care. The phases of care presented are a diagnosis, treatment, the decision, and a recurrence. Factors that influence effective information exchange among patient-provider systems are discussed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Susan Gilbert (2010). Personalized Cancer Care in an Age of Anxiety. Hastings Center Report 40 (5):18-21.
Ruth R. Faden (1997). Managed Care and Informed Consent. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):377-379.
Rebecca Dresser (2011). Bioethics and Cancer: When the Professional Becomes Personal. Hastings Center Report 41 (6):14-18.
Michael J. Meyer (1992). Patients' Duties. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):541-555.
Larry O. Gostin (1997). Personal Privacy in the Health Care System: Employer-Sponsored Insurance, Managed Care, and Integrated Delivery Systems. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):361-376.
Gretchen B. Chapman & Frank A. Sonnenberg (eds.) (2000). Decision Making in Health Care: Theory, Psychology, and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Fiona Randall (1996). Palliative Care Ethics: A Good Companion. Oxford University Press.
Margaret Brazier & Mary Lobjoit (eds.) (1991). Protecting the Vulnerable: Autonomy and Consent in Health Care. Routledge.
Jennifer Bell, Psychosocial Care and Patient Autonomy: A Feminist Argument in Support of a "Meaning-Making" Intervention.
J. Warren Salmon, William White & Joe Feinglass (1990). The Futures of Physicians: Agency and Autonomy Reconsidered. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (4).
Frances M. Alexakos, Attitudes of Rhode Island Primary Care Physicians Toward the Use of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer.
Shlomo Cohen (2014). The Nocebo Effect of Informed Consent. Bioethics 28 (3):147-154.
Kath M. Melia (2004). Health Care Ethics: Lessons From Intensive Care. Sage Publications.
Laurence B. McCullough (1998). A Transcultural, Preventive Ethics Approach to Critical-Care Medicine: Restoring the Critical Care Physician's Power and Authority. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (6):628 – 642.
Frances M. Alexakos (2003). Attitudes of Rhode Island Primary Care Physicians Toward the Use of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer. Dissertation, Salve Regina University
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads6 ( #206,773 of 1,102,846 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,475 of 1,102,846 )
How can I increase my downloads?