Journalistic ethics, objectivity, existential journalism, standpoint epistemology, and public journalism
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (1):3 – 22 (2001)
|Abstract||Objective journalism is blamed frequently for all sorts of journalistic failures and weaknesses, but the critiques typically are flawed because their authors fail to understand objectivity or to define it precisely. This defense of objective journalism defines objectivity and suggests that it is indispensable in a free society, summarizes major critiques of and alternatives to objectivity, and proposes that critics and defenders might serve journalism best by seeking common ground.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dennis D. Cali (2002). Journalism After September 11: Unity as Moral Imperative. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 17 (4):290 – 303.
Andrew Belsey & Ruth F. Chadwick (eds.) (1992). Ethical Issues in Journalism and the Media. Routledge.
Elmer Holmes Davis (1951). Must We Mislead the Public? [Twin Cities Local, American Newspaper Guild and School of Journalism, University of Minnesota.
M. David Arant & Philip Meyer (1998). Public and Traditional Journalism: A Shift in Values? Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (4):205 – 218.
Joseph A. Mirando (2001). Embracing Objectivity Early On: Journalism Textbooks of the 1800s. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (1):23 – 32.
Ian Richards (2005). Quagmires and Quandaries: Exploring Journalism Ethics. University of New South Wales Press.
Kevin Stoker (1995). Existential Objectivity: Freeing Journalists to Be Ethical. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (1):5 – 22.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads124 ( #5,114 of 739,851 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,423 of 739,851 )
How can I increase my downloads?