Journalistic ethics, objectivity, existential journalism, standpoint epistemology, and public journalism

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (1):3 – 22 (2001)
Objective journalism is blamed frequently for all sorts of journalistic failures and weaknesses, but the critiques typically are flawed because their authors fail to understand objectivity or to define it precisely. This defense of objective journalism defines objectivity and suggests that it is indispensable in a free society, summarizes major critiques of and alternatives to objectivity, and proposes that critics and defenders might serve journalism best by seeking common ground.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/S15327728JMME1601_2
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Walter Lippmann (1946). Public Opinion. Philosophical Review 55:497.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Mark Cenite (2005). The Obligation to Qualify Speculation. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20 (1):43 – 61.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

162 ( #9,890 of 1,725,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

9 ( #72,316 of 1,725,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.