David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 8 (1):47 – 64 (1998)
This paper defends both an interpretation of Mencius' moral theory and that theory itself against alternative interpretive defences. I argue that the 'virtue ethics' reading of Mencius wrongly sees him as denying the distinction between moral philosophy and moral psychology. Virtue ethics is flawed, because it makes such a denial. But Mencius' moral theory, in spite of Mencius' obvious interest in moral psychology, does not have that flaw. However, I argue that Mencius is no rationalist. Instead, I show that he upholds a coherentist moral theory, in which reason and psychology both have a role. The final third of the paper compares my interpretation with the work of various important Mencius scholars. I point out that the issue of the difference between moral philosophy and moral psychology is quite important in contemporary Western moral theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Owen J. Flanagan (1991). Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism. Harvard University Press.
Mark Johnson (1993). Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. University of Chicago Press.
Alan H. Goldman (1988). Moral Knowledge. Routledge.
Heiner Roetz (1993). Confucian Ethics of the Axial Age a Reconstruction Under the Aspect of the Breakthrough Toward Postconventional Thinking. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Manyul Im (1999). Emotional Control and Virtue in the "Mencius". Philosophy East and West 49 (1):1-27.
A. S. Cua (2001). Xin and Moral Failure: Reflections on Mencius' Moral Psychologyand Moral Failure: Reflections on Mencius' Moral Psychology. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1 (1):31-53.
Amit Chaturvedi (2012). Mencius and Dewey on Moral Perception, Deliberation, and Imagination. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (2):163-185.
James A. Ryan (1997). A Defence of Mencius' Ethical Naturalism. Asian Philosophy 7 (1):23 – 36.
A. T. Nuyen (2009). Moral Obligation and Moral Motivation in Confucian Role-Based Ethics. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (1):1-11.
James Behuniak Jr (2011). Naturalizing Mencius. Philosophy East and West 61 (3):492-515.
Qiyong Guo (2007). Mou Zongsan's View of Interpreting Confucianism by “Moral Autonomy”. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):345-362.
David Morrow (2009). Moral Psychology and the Mencian Creature. Philosophical Psychology 22 (3):281-304.
James Behuniak (2002). Mencius on Becoming Human. Dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa
Bongrae Seok (2008). Mencius's Vertical Faculties and Moral Nativism. Asian Philosophy 18 (1):51 – 68.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads40 ( #100,344 of 1,793,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #281,225 of 1,793,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?