Philosophy as a Science
The New Scholasticism 16 (3):305-305 (1942)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Ryan D. Tweney, Michael E. Doherty & Clifford R. Mynatt (eds.) (1981). On Scientific Thinking. Columbia University Press.
David Stump (1992). Naturalized Philosophy of Science with a Plurality of Methods. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):456-460.
Janet A. Kourany (2003). A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty‐First Century. Philosophy of Science 70 (1):1-14.
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. University of Chicago Press.
Janet A. Kourany (2010). Philosophy of Science After Feminism. Oxford University Press.
John Wettersten (2005). Popper's Historical Role: Innovative Dissident. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 36 (1):119 - 133.
W. J. Mander (1991). F. H. Bradley and the Philosophy of Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (1):65 – 78.
Matthew J. Brown (2012). John Dewey's Logic of Science. Hopos 2 (2):258-306.
William Desmond, John Steffen & Koen Decoster (eds.) (2001). Beyond Conflict and Reduction: Between Philosophy, Science, and Religion. Leuven University Press.
Henri Poincaré (1946). The Foundations of Science: Science and Hypothesis, the Value of Science, Science and Method. Lancaster, Pa.,The Science Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
