David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Neuroethics 6 (1):79-83 (2013)
Whether it is morally acceptable to offer rehabilitation by CNS-intervention to criminals as a condition for early release constitutes an important neuroethical question. Bomann-Larsen has recently suggested that such interventions are unacceptable if the offered treatment is not narrowly targeted at the behaviour for which the criminal is convicted. In this article it is argued that Bomann-Larsen’s analysis of the morality of offers does not provide a solid base for this conclusion and that, even if the analysis is assumed to be correct, it still does not follow that voluntary rehabilitation schemes targeting behaviour beyond the act for which a criminal is convicted are inappropriate
|Keywords||Bomann-Larsen Inappropriate offers Neurotechnological treatment Rehabilitation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jared N. Craig (2016). Incarceration, Direct Brain Intervention, and the Right to Mental Integrity – a Reply to Thomas Douglas. Neuroethics 9 (2):107-118.
Thomas Douglas (2014). Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity. Journal of Ethics 18 (2):101-122.
Similar books and articles
Lene Bomann-Larsen (2013). Voluntary Rehabilitation? On Neurotechnological Behavioural Treatment, Valid Consent and (In)Appropriate Offers. Neuroethics 6 (1):65-77.
Lene Bomann-Larsen (2004). Licence to Kill? The Question of Just Vs. Unjust Combatants. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):142-160.
Andrew Day (2011). Offender Rehabilitation: Current Problems and Ethically Informed Approaches to Intervention. Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (4):348-360.
J. A. O. Larsen (1955). Representative Government in Greek and Roman History. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Stephen Kershnar (2004). Respect for Persons and the Harsh Punishment of Criminals. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1):103-121.
Lene Bomann-Larsen (2010). Revisionism and Desert. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.
Anika A. Jordbru, Ejgil Jespersen & Egil Martinsen (2008). Conversion Gait Disordermeeting Patients in Behaviour, Reuniting Body and Mind. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (2):185 – 199.
Ejgil Jespersen, Anika A. Jordbru & Egil Martinsen (2008). Conversion Gait Disorder—Meeting Patients in Behaviour, Reuniting Body and Mind. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (2):185-199.
Katrina Sifferd (2012). Changing the Criminal Character: Nanotechnology and Criminal Punishment. In A. Santosuosso (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Law and Science Young Scholars Symposium. Pavia University Press
Richard L. Lippke (2011). Why Sex (Offending) Is Different. Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (2):151-172.
Martin Wright (1996). Justice for Victims and Offenders: A Restorative Response to Crime. Waterside Press.
Charles Weijer, Peter A. Singer, Bernard M. Dickens & Stephen Workman, Bioethics for Clinicians: 16. Dealing with Demands for Inappropriate Treatment.
Allan W. Larsen (2005). The Last Refuge. Environmental Philosophy 2 (2):72-73.
J. A. O. Larsen (1959). Liberalism in Greek Politics. Philosophical Review 68 (1):103-109.
Added to index2011-12-17
Total downloads21 ( #185,953 of 1,911,526 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,720 of 1,911,526 )
How can I increase my downloads?