Back to the Ontological Argument; Rejoinder
Mind 45:53-57 (1937)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Collingwood Metaphysics | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGiuseppina D'Oro (2000). On Collingwood's Rehabilitation of the Ontological Argument. Idealistic Studies 30 (3):173-188.
Gilbert Ryle (1935). Mr. Collingwood and the Ontological Argument. Mind 44 (174):137-151.
Errol E. Harris (1936). Mr. Collingwood and the Ontological Argument; Reply to G. Ryle. Mind 45:474-480.
Michael J. O'Neill (2006). A Peculiar “Faith”: On R.G. Collingwood's Use of Saint Anselm's Argument. Saint Anselm Journal 3 (2):32-47.
William J. Mander (2012). Idealism and the Ontological Argument. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):993-1014.
Gilbert Ryle (1937). Back to the Ontological Argument. Mind 46 (181):53-57.
Raymun Festin (2005). At the Crossroads of Historiography and Metaphysics of History. Idealistic Studies 35 (1):35-47.
Rex Martin (1989). Collingwood's Claim That Metaphysics is a Historical Discipline. The Monist 72 (4):489-525.
William F. Vallicella (2000). Does the Cosmological Argument Depend on the Ontological? Faith and Philosophy 17 (4):441-458.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-10-17Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
