David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1063-1072 (2003)
Although Trautman (1966) appears to give a unified-field treatment of electrodynamics in Newtonian spacetime, there are difficulties in cogently interpreting it as such in relation to the facts of electromagnetic and magneto-electric induction. Presented here is a covariant, non-unified field treatment of the Maxwell-Lorentz theory with absolute space. This dispels a worry in Earman (1989) as to whether there are any historically realistic examples in which absolute space plays an indispenable role. It also shows how Trautman`s formulation can be rendered coherent, albeit at the cost of de-unification, by reinterpreting the Maxwell tensor as a composite object involving, in part, elements from Newtonian spacetime.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Melvin Alonzo[from old catalog] Cook (1955). Unification Through Lorentz Transformations to Realms of Simple Harmonicity and Reciprocal Space. Salt Lake City.
Herbert Dingle (1960). Relativity and Electromagnetism: An Epistemological Appraisal. Philosophy of Science 27 (3):233-253.
D. Dieks (2001). Space and Time in Particle and Field Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (2):217-241.
Carl Hoefer (1998). Absolute Versus Relational Spacetime: For Better or Worse, the Debate Goes On. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):451-467.
Robert Rynasiewicz (2003). Field Unification in the Maxwell‐Lorentz Theory with Absolute Space. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1063-1072.
Mael A. Melvin (1982). Towards Unified Field Theory: Quantitative Differences and Qualitative Sameness. Synthese 50 (3):359 - 397.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #84,526 of 1,012,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,700 of 1,012,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?