Pragmatics without Pragmatism: Reply to Fantl & McGrath
| Abstract | To accept ‘pragmatic encroachment’ is to take the view that whether you are in a position to know is in part a function of practical stakes. This position strikes many as not just unorthodox but extremely implausible. According to Jeremy Fantl and Matthew McGrath (F&M), however, the best account of the prima facie oddity of certain utterances incorporates just such a pragmatist maneuver. In reaching this conclusion, F&M begin with Trent Dougherty and Patrick Rysiew’s (D&R’s) theory as the best on offer (2009a: 63/2009b: 20), but go on to raise objections to D&R’s recent account of the relevant oddity in purely pragmatic (i.e., extra-semantic) terms and to develop it in directions quite inimical to the general outlook established in D&R 2009 and D&R forthcoming. In this brief note, we reply to F&M’s objections and show that their development in the direction of interest-relativism is ill-founded: the relevant phenomena provide no grounds for budging on the issue of pragmatic encroachment. In addition, in the course of meeting F&M’s objections, an original account of certain Moore-paradoxical sentences is given, and the issue of how probable a proposition needs to be to be known is addressed. The result is a quite general defense of a commonsense, evidence-based approach to the relevant phenomena (quite apart from a defense of D&R) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesJeremy Fantl & Matthew McGrath (2012). Pragmatic Encroachment: It's Not Just About Knowledge. [REVIEW] Episteme 9 (1):27-42.
Jeremy Fantl & Matthew McGrath (2002). Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification. Philosophical Review 111 (1):67-94.
Jeremy Fantl & Matthew Mcgrath (2007). On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):558–589.
Matthew McGrath & Jeremy Fantl (2002). ``Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification&Quot. Philosophical Review 111 (1):67--74.
Trent Dougherty & Patrick Rysiew (2011). Clarity About Concessive Knowledge Attributions: Reply to Dodd. Synthese 181 (3):395-403.
J. Fantl & M. McGrath (2002). ``Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justifcation&Quot. Philosophical Review 111:67--94.
Matthew McGrath & Jeremy Fantl (2009). Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford University Press.
Brian Weatherson (2005). Can We Do Without Pragmatic Encroachment? Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):417–443.
Dorit Ganson (2008). Evidentialism and Pragmatic Constraints on Outright Belief. Philosophical Studies 139 (3):441 - 458.
Andrea Onofri (forthcoming). On Non-Pragmatic Millianism. Philosophical Studies.
Ram Neta (2012). Knowledge in an Uncertain World. By Jeremy Fantl and Matthew McGrath. (New York: Oxford UP, 2009. Pp. Xxi + 251. Price US$60.00.). [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):211-215.
Stephen Grimm (2011). On Intellectualism in Epistemology. Mind 120 (479):705-733.
Jeremy Fantl & Matthew Mcgrath (2012). Précis of Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):441-446.
Jeremy Fantl & Matthew Mcgrath (2012). Replies to Cohen, Neta and Reed. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):473-490.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-06-15Total downloads25 ( #49,632 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,263 of 549,119 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
