Randomized controlled trials versus rough set analysis: two competing approaches for evaluating clinical data

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (4):271-288 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present paper deals with the problem of evaluating empirical evidence for therapeutic decisions in medicine. The article discusses the views of Nancy Cartwright and John Worrall on the function that randomization plays in ascertaining causal relations with reference to the therapies applied. The main purpose of the paper is to present a general idea of alternative method of evaluating empirical evidence. The method builds on data analysis that makes use of rough set theory. The first attempts to apply the method show that it is an interesting alternative to randomized controlled trials

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Corroborating evidence‐based medicine.Alexander Mebius - 2014 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 20 (6):915-920.
Shortcomings of the randomized controlled trial: a view from the boondocks.Joseph Herman Md - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):283-286.
Problems associated with randomized controlled clinical trials in breast cancer.Ann E. Johnson - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (2):119-126.
On the scientific inference from clinical trials.L. Holmberg, M. Baum & H. O. Adami Md - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (2):157-162.
Attitudes to evidence in acupuncture: an interview study. [REVIEW]Kirsten Hansen - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):279-285.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-20

Downloads
30 (#517,657)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tomasz Rzepiński
Adam Mickiewicz University

References found in this work

Nature's capacities and their measurement.Nancy Cartwright - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic.Ian Hacking - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Are rcts the gold standard?Nancy Cartwright - 2007 - Biosocieties 1 (1):11-20.
What evidence in evidence-based medicine?John Worrall - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S316-S330.
What Evidence in Evidence‐Based Medicine?John Worrall - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (S3):S316-S330.

View all 15 references / Add more references