Logic and Abstraction as Capabilities of the Mind: Reconceptualizations of Computational Approaches to the Mind
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this chapter we will investigate the nature of abstraction in detail, its entwinement with logical thinking, and the general role it plays for the mind. We find that non-logical capabilities are not only important for input processing, but also for output processing. Human beings jointly use analytic and embodied capacities for thinking and acting, where analytic thinking mirrors reflection and logic, and where abstraction is the form in which embodied thinking is revealed to us. We will follow the philosophical analyses of Heidegger and Polanyi to elaborate the fundamental difference between abstraction and logics and how they come together in the mind. If computational approaches to mind are to be successful, they must be able to recognize meaningful and salient elements of a context and engage in abstraction. Computational minds must be able to imagine and volitionally blend abstractions as a way of recognizing gestalt contexts. And it must be able to discern the validity of these blendings in ways that, in humans, arise from a sensus communis.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis (2012). Abstraction and the Origin of General Ideas. Philosophers' Imprint 12 (19):1-22.
Donald L. M. Baxter (1997). Abstraction, Inseparability, and Identity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):307-330.
Giuseppe Primiero (2009). Proceeding in Abstraction. From Concepts to Types and the Recent Perspective on Information. History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (3):257-282.
Timothy R. Colburn (1999). Software, Abstraction, and Ontology. The Monist 82 (1):3-19.
Eric Thomas Updike (2012). Abstraction in Fitch's Basic Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (3):215-243.
K. Mainzer (2008). The Emergence of Mind and Brain: And Evolutionary, Computational, and Philosophical Approach. In Rahul Banerjee & B. K. Chakrabarti (eds.), Models of Brain and Mind: Physical, Computational, and Psychological Approaches. Elsevier
Sergio F. Martínez & Xiang Huang (2011). Epistemic Groundings of Abstraction and Their Cognitive Dimension. Philosophy of Science 78 (3):490-511.
Shaun Gallagher & Daniel J. Povinelli (2012). Enactive and Behavioral Abstraction Accounts of Social Understanding in Chimpanzees, Infants, and Adults. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (1):145-169.
Timothy Colburn & Gary Shute (2010). Abstraction, Law, and Freedom in Computer Science. Metaphilosophy 41 (3):345-364.
Eleanor Knox (2015). Abstraction and its Limits: Finding Space For Novel Explanation. Noûs 49 (3):41-60.
R. Kasturirangan (2008). Thinking is Believing. In Rahul Banerjee & B. K. Chakrabarti (eds.), Models of Brain and Mind: Physical, Computational, and Psychological Approaches. Elsevier
Cynthia A. Stark (2010). Abstraction and Justification in Moral Theory. Hypatia 25 (4):825-833.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-20
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?