On the logic of perception sentences

Synthese 54 (1):115 - 128 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I discuss perception sentences of the following there syn- tactic types: John saw Mary John saw Mary run John saw that Mary run Our aim is to present an interpretation of Hintikka's logic of perception, extend it to case and dened the approach against the cirticism levelled against it by Jon Barwise.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Questions.Peter Hanks - 2006 - In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 10. Detroit et al.: Thomson Gale. pp. 32-37.
Perception and Animal Belief.L. S. Carrier - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (212):193 - 209.
The Modal Logic of Gödel Sentences.Hirohiko Kushida - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (5):577 - 590.
Fuzzy logic and arithmetical hierarchy III.Petr Hájek - 2001 - Studia Logica 68 (1):129-142.
Practical inferences.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1971 - Berkeley,: University of California Press.
Identificational Sentences.Friederike Moltmann - 2013 - Natural Language Semantics 21 (1):43-77.
Quantum Logic and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:55 - 67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#318,154)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?