Biological Organization and Cross-Generation Functions
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):583-606 (2011)
| Abstract | The organizational account of biological functions interprets functions as contributions of a trait to the maintenance of the organization that, in turn, maintains the trait. As has been recently argued, however, the account seems unable to provide a unified grounding for both intra- and cross-generation functions, since the latter do not contribute to the maintenance of the same organization which produces them. To face this ‘ontological problem’, a splitting account has been proposed, according to which the two kinds of functions require distinct organizational definitions. In this article, we propose a solution for the ontological problem, by arguing that intra- and cross-generation functions can be said to contribute in the same way to the maintenance of the biological organization, characterized in terms of organizational self-maintenance. As a consequence, we suggest maintaining a unified organizational account of biological functions | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMatteo Mossio, Cristian Saborido & Alvaro Moreno (2009). An Organizational Account of Biological Functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):813-841.
Robert Arp (2007). Evolution and Two Popular Proposals for the Definition of Function. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):19 - 30.
Andrés Luis Jaume Rodríguez (2008). The Sources of Normativity in the Biological Functions. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 44:33-44.
Pieter E. Vermaas (2009). On Unification : Taking Technical Functions as Objective (and Biological Functions as Subjective). In Ulrich Krohs & Peter Kroes (eds.), Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. Mit Press.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (1994). A Modern History Theory of Functions. Noûs 28 (3):344-362.
Benoni B. Edin (2008). Assigning Biological Functions: Making Sense of Causal Chains. Synthese 161 (2):203 - 218.
Kenneth G. Ferguson (2007). Biological Function and Normativity. Philo 10 (1):17-26.
Christian Steiner (2009). Unity in the Concept of Function. Conceptus (94):91-106.
Attila Grandpierre (2013). The Origin of Cellular Life and Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics:1-15.
Paul E. Griffiths (1993). Functional Analysis and Proper Functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):409-422.
Françoise Longy (2009). How Biological, Cultural, and Intended Functions Combine. In Ulrich Krohs & Peter Kroes (eds.), Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. Mit Press.
Daniel M. Kraemer (2013). Statistical Theories of Functions and the Problem of Epidemic Disease. Biology and Philosophy 28 (3):423-438.
János Szentágothai (1993). Self-Organization: The Basic Principle of Neural Functions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (2).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-02-16Total downloads29 ( #42,487 of 551,055 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,055 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
