David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hobbes Studies 12 (1):3-25 (1999)
This article explains the apparent tension between Hobbes' late work A Dialogue between A Philosopher and A Student of the Common Laws of England and his avowed goal of a deductive philosophy which eschews rhetoric and history, by analysing the difference between Hobbes' civil and natural philosophy. A Dialogue's simultaneous use of deduction, rhetoric, and historical citation is congruent with the method applied by Hobbes in Leviathan in order to construct his "civil philosophy". This highlights Hobbes' awareness increasing with the years of the difference between the teachings of "natural philosophy" which are understood by demonstration, and once this is done are evident per se, and those of politics and jurisprudence which in order to make the people obey the sovereign maintaining peace and security, may require employing the language of persuasion before and after being demonstrated. However, I have argued that the awareness of this difference does not undermine the general unity of his philosophical system and in particular of his notion of science
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Giuseppe Mario Saccone, History as Rhetoric in Hobbes' Dialogue of the Common Laws and the Rise of Modern Philosophy.
Thomas Hobbes (2005). A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student, of the Common Laws of England. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Hobbes (1990). Dialogue Entre Un Philosophe Et Un Légiste des Common-Laws D'angleterre. J. Vrin.
Howard Williams (2012). Natural Right in Hobbes and Kant. Hobbes Studies 25 (1):66-90.
Mark Murphy (2005). Review of Thomas Hobbes, Alan Cromartie (Ed.), Quentin Skinner (Ed.), Writings on Common Law and Hereditary Right, Consisting of a Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student, of the Common Laws of England. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (12).
Stephen Finn (2001). Geometry and the Science of Morality in Hobbes. Social Philosophy Today 17:57-66.
Gabriella Slomp (2007). Kant Against Hobbes: Reasoning and Rhetoric. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):207-222.
S. A. Lloyd (2009). Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: Cases in the Law of Nature. Cambridge University Press.
Harold J. Johnson (1973). Book Review:A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England. Thomas Hobbes, Joseph Cropsey. [REVIEW] Ethics 83 (3):261-.
A. P. Martinich (2011). Reason and Reciprocity in Hobbes's Political Philosophy: On Sharon Lloyd's: Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes Studies 23 (2):158-169.
Andres Rosler (2011). Odi Et Amo? Hobbes on the State of Nature. Hobbes Studies 24 (1):91-111.
Henrik Syse (2007). Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Natural Law and Natural Rights, with Special Emphasis on the Teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. St. Augustine's Press.
Patricia Sheridan (2012). Resisting the Scaffold: Self-Preservation and Limits of Obligation in Hobbes's Leviathan. Hobbes Studies 24 (2):137-157.
Daniel Lee (2012). Hobbes and the Civil Law : The Use of Roman Law in Hobbes's Civil Science. In David Dyzenhaus & Thomas Poole (eds.), Hobbes and the Law. Cambridge University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-15
Total downloads1 ( #499,222 of 1,410,137 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,137 )
How can I increase my downloads?