David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):273-294 (2011)
It is generally recognized that Adorno and Levinas should both be read as urging a rethinking of ethics in light of Auschwitz. This demand should be understood in terms of the acknowledgement of transcendence. A phenomenological account of the event of Auschwitz developed by Todes motivates my use of Cavell’s distinction between acknowledgement and knowledge. Both Levinas and Adorno argue that an ethically adequate acknowledgement of transcendence requires that the traditional concept of transcendence as represented in theodicy must be rejected. This rejection takes the form of a rejection of theodicy (Levinas) and a negative theodicy (Adorno). I argue that Adorno’s response is superior because it is a response to the specificity and particularity of the event of Auschwitz as the destruction of, rather than merely the denial of, the humanity of both perpetrators and victims
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Samuel Shearn (2013). Moral Critique and Defence of Theodicy. Religious Studies 49 (4):439-458.
Similar books and articles
Espen Hammer (2000). Adorno and Extreme Evil. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):75-93.
Nick Smith (2007). Adorno Vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306.
Asher Howoritz (2002). 'By a Hair's Breadth': Critique, Transcendence and the Ethical in Adorno and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2).
Robert Bernasconi (2005). No Exit: Levinas' Aporetic Account of Transcendence. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):101-117.
Matthew T. Eggemeier (2012). Lévinas and Ricoeur on the Possibility of God After the End of Theodicy. Philosophy and Theology 24 (1):23-48.
Kris Sealey (2011). The Primacy of Disruption in Levinas Account of Transcendence. Research in Phenomenology 40 (3):363-377.
Nick Smith (2008). Questions for a Reluctant Jurisprudence of Alterity. In Desmond Manderson (ed.), Essays on Levinas and Law: A Mosaic. Palgrave Macmillan.
Theodorus de Boer (1997). The Rationality of Transcendence: Studies in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. J.C. Gieben.
Donald L. Turner & Ford Turrell (2007). The Non-Existent God: Transcendence, Humanity, and Ethics in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. Philosophia 35 (3-4):375 - 382.
A. Horowitz (2002). 'By a Hair's Breadth': Critique, Transcendence and the Ethical in Adorno and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2):213-248.
Hent de Vries (2005). Minimal Theologies: Critiques of Secular Reason in Adorno and Levinas. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eric S. Nelson (2012). Against Liberty: Adorno, Levinas, and the Pathologies of Freedom. Theoria 60 (131):64-83..
Oona Eisenstadt (2006). Levinas and Adorno: Universalizing the Jew After Auschwitz. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1):131-151.
J. M. Jackson (2010). Persecution and Social Histories: Towards an Adornian Critique of Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (6):719-733.
Bettina Bergo (2005). Ontology, Transcendence, and Immanence in Emmanuel Levinas' Philosophy. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):141-180.
Added to index2011-03-25
Total downloads21 ( #81,671 of 1,101,623 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #81,804 of 1,101,623 )
How can I increase my downloads?