David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 160 (2):323-343 (2012)
The principle of fair equality of opportunity is regularly used to justify social policies, both in the philosophical literature and in public discourse. However, too often commentators fail to make explicit just what they take the principle to say. A principle of fair equality of opportunity does not say anything at all until certain variables are filled in. I want to draw attention to two variables, timing and currency. I argue that once we identify the few plausible ways we have at our disposal for filling in those variables, it will become apparent that a reasonable version of the principle will be quite narrow. Its usefulness as a justificatory basis for social policies will be limited to those policies that target the distribution of competitive opportunities among people entering majority.
|Keywords||Fair equality of opportunity Rawls|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Robert Nozick (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books.
John Rawls (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press.
John Rawls (2009). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press 133-135.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark Navin (2008). Fair Equality of Opportunity in Global Justice. Social Philosophy Today 24:39-52.
Larry A. Alexander (1985). Fair Equality of Opportunity. Philosophy Research Archives 11:197-208.
Liam Shields (2013). From Rawlsian Autonomy to Sufficient Opportunity in Education. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (1):1470594-13505413.
Richard J. Arneson (1999). Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity. Philosophical Studies 93 (1):77-112.
Matt Cavanagh (2002). Against Equality of Opportunity. Clarendon Press.
Oliver Feeney (2006). Equality of Whom? A Genetic Perspective on Equality (of Opportunity). Res Publica 12 (4):357-383.
Ovadia Ezra (2007). Equality of Opportunity and Affirmative Action. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):22-37.
Gillian Brock (2005). The Difference Principle, Equality of Opportunity, and Cosmopolitan Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (3):333-351.
Rodney G. Peffer (2008). A Modified Rawlsian Theory of Social Justice: “Justice as Fair Rights”. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:593-608.
Michele Loi (2012). Germ-Line Enhancements and Rough Equality. Ethical Perspectives 19 (1):55-82.
Gert Jan van der Wilt (1994). Health Care and the Principle of Fair Equality of Opportunity. Bioethics 8 (4):329–349.
Gert Jan van Der Wilt (1994). Health Care and the Principle of Fair Equality of Opportunity. Bioethics 8 (4):329-349.
Rodney G. Peffer (1998). What is to Be Distributed? The Paideia Project.
Seana Valentine Shiffrin (2004). Race, Labor, and the Fair Equality of Opportunity Principle. Fordham Law Review 1643-1675 (2004) 72 (5):1643-1675.
Zoltan Miklosi (2010). How Does the Difference Principle Make a Difference? Res Publica 16 (3):263-280.
Added to index2011-04-18
Total downloads82 ( #58,273 of 1,902,527 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #131,463 of 1,902,527 )
How can I increase my downloads?