Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (2):159-191 (1982)
|Abstract||Patrick Suppes'' set-theoretical approach to the analysis of theories, and Joseph D. Sneed''s metatheory are briefly outlined. The notions of observation, illusion and hallucination are reconstructed according to these approaches. It is argued that the terms perception and truth are theoretical with respect to observation but nontheoretical with respect to illusion and hallucination. Hallucination is construed as a special kind of illusion.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David R. Hilbert (2004). Hallucination, Sense-Data and Direct Realism. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):185-191.
Michael Thau (2004). What is Disjunctivism? Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):193-253.
A. D. Smith (2002). The Problem of Perception. Harvard University Press.
J. Barry Maund (1976). The Non-Sensuous Epistemic Account of Perception. American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (January):57-62.
Heather Logue (2010). Getting Acquainted with Naïve Realism: Critical Notice of Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Philosophical Books 51 (1):22-38.
Jack Pustilnik (1965). Austin on Some Problems of Perception. Southern Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):18-22.
Peter R. King (2010). Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Philosophical Psychology 23 (5):715-719.
Mark Johnston (2004). The Obscure Object of Hallucination. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):113-83.
Anders Nes (2011). Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion, by William Fish. Mind 120 (479):856-859.
Daya Krishna (2003). Illusion, Hallucination and the Problem of Truth. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 20 (4):129-146.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #56,255 of 549,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?