David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (6):737-788 (2001)
I present an analysis of Free Choice Items (FCIs), based on Scandinavian, where FCIs are complex and distinct from polarity sensitive items. Scandinavian FCIs are argued to have two components. One is a universal quantifying into modal contexts. The other is an operator mapping a type (s,t) expression onto itself, adjoining to the closest type t or (s,t) expression. Thus invoking Intensional Functional Application, this operator requires the presence of a modal in the scope of the universal quantifier. Facts concerning ‘essential connections’ and ‘existential import’ are accounted for by assuming that the FC determiner has the option of acting like a quantifier.
|Keywords||Linguistics Philosophy of Language Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistics Semantics Syntax|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Strand (2009). Corporate Responsibility in Scandinavian Supply Chains. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1):179 - 185.
Manfred Krifka (1991). Some Remarks on Polarity Items. In Dietmar Zaefferer (ed.), Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics. Foris Publications. 150--189.
A. Zepter (2003). How to Be Universal When You Are Existential: Negative Polarity Items in the Comparative: Entailment Along a Scale. Journal of Semantics 20 (2):193-237.
Morten P. Broberg (1996). Corporate Social Responsibility in the European Communities — the Scandinavian Viewpoint. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (6):615 - 622.
Nicholas Asher & Daniel Bonevac (2005). Free Choice Permission is Strong Permission. Synthese 145 (3):303 - 323.
Jacques Jayez & Lucia M. Tovena (2005). Free Choiceness and Non-Individuation. Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (1):1 - 71.
Anastasia Giannakidou & Lisa Cheng (2006). (In)Definiteness, Polarity, and the Role of Wh-Morphology in Free Choice. Journal of Semantics 23 (2):135-183.
Anastasia Giannakidou (2001). The Meaning of Free Choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (6):659-735.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #165,352 of 1,410,137 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,137 )
How can I increase my downloads?