Synthese 33 (2-4):195--210 (1976)
|Abstract||A semantics of vagueness should reject the principle that every statement has a truth-value yet retain the classical tautologies. A many-value, non-truth-functional semantics and a semantics of super-valuations each have this result. According to the super-valuation approach, 'if a man with n hairs on his head is bald, then a man with n plus one hairs on his head is also bald' is false because it comes out false no matter how the vague predicate 'is bald' is appropriately made precise. But why should a sentence in which components actually remain imprecise be regarded as actually false just because it would be false if its components were precise? On one of the alternative treatments of quantification allowed by the many-value approach, the sentence in question is assigned an intermediate value closer to 'false' than to 'true'. Despite the elegance of the super-valuation approach, there are reasons to prefer the many-value approach.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joan Weiner (2007). Science and Semantics: The Case of Vagueness and Supervaluation. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):355–374.
Delia Graff Fara (2011). Truth in a Region. In Paul Egre & Nathan Klinedinst (eds.), Vagueness and Language Use. Palgrave Macmillan.
Delia Graff Fara (2003). Gap Principles, Penumbral Consequence, and Infinitely Higher-Order Vagueness. In J. C. Beall (ed.), New Essays on the Semantics of Paradox. Oxford University Press.
Roy A. Sorensen (2000). A Vague Demonstration. Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (5):507-522.
Delia Graff Fara (2002). An Anti-Epistemicist Consequence of Margin for Error Semantics for Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):127-142.
D. Barnett (2011). Does Vagueness Exclude Knowledge? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (1):22-45.
David Barnett (2011). Does Vagueness Exclude Knowledge? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (1):22-45.
Matt Leonard (2012). Burge's Contextual Theory of Truth and the Super-Liar Paradox. In Michal Pelis Vit Puncochar (ed.), The Logica Yearbook 2011. College Publications.
Philippe Schlenker (2010). Super Liars. Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (3):374-414.
Nobu-Yuki Suzuki (1999). Algebraic Kripke Sheaf Semantics for Non-Classical Predicate Logics. Studia Logica 63 (3):387-416.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #147,054 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?