Symmetry and unity in the theory of anaphora
| Abstract | The primary goal of this paper is to distinguish binding from reflexivity in domains where they appear to overlap. In so doing I will argue that Principles A and B of the Binding Theory are symmetric in the domains to which they apply. This symmetry derives from a deeper unity that permits us to dispense with Principles A and B and replace them with interpretive principles that distinguish reflexivity and binding. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesP. Kosso (1999). Symmetry Arguments in Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (3):479-492.
Eric Hammer (1996). Symmetry as a Method of Proof. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):523 - 543.
Jeff Malpas (1999). Constituting the Mind: Kant, Davidson, and the Unity of Consciousness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):1-30.
Simon Saunders (2007). Mirroring as an a Priori Symmetry. Philosophy of Science 74 (4):452-480.
Alexandre Laforgue (1994). Les Brisures de Symetrie du Temps. Acta Biotheoretica 42 (1).
Alexandre Laforgue (1993). Les Brisures de Symetrie du Temps. Acta Biotheoretica 41 (1-2).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #180,507 of 556,896 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
