Graduate studies at Western
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 8 (1):144-162 (1977)
|Abstract||Summary Methodological disputes in economics have been with us since Mill and Senior fought over the nature of economic science in the first half of the 19th Century. Progress has been extremely slow, and there is good reason for this as the present essay hopes to show|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel M. Hausman (1992). Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge University Press.
Lukasz Hardt (2010). Criticizing the Critique. Some Methodological Insights Into the Debate on the State of Economic Theory in the Face of the Post 2008 Crisis. Bank&Credit 41 (4):7-22.
Daniel M. Hausman (ed.) (2008). The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology. Cambridge University Press.
Daniel M. Hausman, Philosophy of Economics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (1998). Prediction and Prescription in Economics: A Philosophical and Methodological Approach. Theoria 13 (2):321-345.
Robert Wutscher, Robert P. Murphy & Walter E. Block (2010). Mathematics in Economics: An Austrian Methodological Critique. Philosophical Investigations 33 (1):44-66.
Subroto Roy (1989/1991). Philosophy of Economics: On the Scope of Reason in Economic Inquiry. Routledge.
Claes Gustafsson (2012). The Production of Seriousness: The Metaphysics of Economic Reason. Palgrave Macmillan.
Uskali Mäki (2009). Reading the Methodological Essay in Twentieth Century Economics: Map of Multiple Perspectives. In Uskali Mäki (ed.), The methodology of positive economics : Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,611 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,423 of 739,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?