Journal for General Philosophy of Science 8 (1):144-162 (1977)
|Abstract||Summary Methodological disputes in economics have been with us since Mill and Senior fought over the nature of economic science in the first half of the 19th Century. Progress has been extremely slow, and there is good reason for this as the present essay hopes to show|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel M. Hausman (1992). Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge University Press.
Claes Gustafsson (2012). The Production of Seriousness: The Metaphysics of Economic Reason. Palgrave Macmillan.
Subroto Roy (1989/1991). Philosophy of Economics: On the Scope of Reason in Economic Inquiry. Routledge.
Robert Wutscher, Robert P. Murphy & Walter E. Block (2010). Mathematics in Economics: An Austrian Methodological Critique. Philosophical Investigations 33 (1):44-66.
Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (1998). Prediction and Prescription in Economics: A Philosophical and Methodological Approach. Theoria 13 (2):321-345.
Daniel M. Hausman, Philosophy of Economics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Daniel M. Hausman (ed.) (2008). The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology. Cambridge University Press.
Lukasz Hardt (2010). Criticizing the Critique. Some Methodological Insights Into the Debate on the State of Economic Theory in the Face of the Post 2008 Crisis. Bank&Credit 41 (4):7-22.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #99,483 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?