David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The cognitive science of religion is a relatively recent attempt to explain religious beliefs using the methods of cognitive science. There has been interest amongst an ever increasing number of scientists, philosophers and theologians as to the impact this research might have on the justification of the religious beliefs themselves. I will examine the impact the cognitive science of religion has upon Alvin Plantinga’s reformed epistemology, which claims that belief in God can be warranted even if it is not based on evidence. Throughout the course of discussion, I shall consider if the cognitive science of religion poses epistemological and ontological problems for Plantinga’s model of theistic belief. I shall claim that the cognitive science of atheism offers a more plausible challenge to Plantinga’s account than the cognitive science of religion
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Justin L. Barrett (2010). Reformed Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion. Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):174-189.
Donald Hatcher (1986). Plantinga and Reformed Epistemology. Philosophy and Theology 1 (1):84-95.
S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī (2011). Augustinian Science: Alvin Plantinga’s Idea on Philosophizing and Scientific Theorizing Based on Religious Belief. Dissertation, Mofid University
Joshua C. Thurow (2013). Does Cognitive Science Show Belief in God to Be Irrational? The Epistemic Consequences of the Cognitive Science of Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):77-98.
Derek S. Jeffreys (1997). How Reformed is Reformed Epistemology? Alvin Plantinga and Calvin's ‘Sensus Divinitatis’. Religious Studies 33 (4):419-431.
Ryan Nichols & Robert Callergård (2011). Thomas Reid on Reidian Religious Belief Forming Faculties. The Modern Schoolman 88 (3):317-335.
Evan Fales (1996). Plantinga's Case Against Naturalistic Epistemology. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):432-451.
Amir Dastmalchian (2013). The Epistemology of Religious Diversity in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. Philosophy Compass 8 (3):298-308.
Alvin Plantinga (2010). Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? Oxford University press.
Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt (2013). Reformed and Evolutionary Epistemology and the Noetic Effects of Sin. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):49-66.
Alvin Plantinga (2011). Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford University Press.
Tyler Wunder (2007). Critical Study of James K. Beilby, Epistemology as Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga's Religious Epistemology. Philo 10 (2):168-186.
Michael Czapkay Sudduth (1999). Can Religious Unbelief Be Proper Function Rational? Faith and Philosophy 16 (3):297-314.
Stephen R. Grimm (2001). Cardinal Newman, Reformed Epistemologist? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (4):497-522.
Added to index2012-02-15
Total downloads25 ( #57,748 of 1,018,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #16,075 of 1,018,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?